Part 3: Frame Attachment and Articulation Test

20100928

Navigation Links
 Trip Home Page     

 


The Trip

We had several down days while Rob was attending to family matters with his new twins.  When we started work again, the objective was to attach the frame members to the frame and perform a frame articulation test.

The Photos

The photos below are what we saw.

The original red factory primer can be seen where the original bed mounting bracket had been before it was relocated rearward about 2 feet.  The resulting space will be used for mounting a frame to hold 2 30# propane bottles.  Unlike the Alaskan camper, this camper has a much bigger appetite for propane due to the refrigerator, water heater, forced air space heater and cook top/oven.  And, I may add a catalytic heater as well.

The camper had sat on the truck over the weekend and we had plenty of time to measure things required for attachment of the pivot points.  In the end, due to flexure in the camper body itself, we elected to increase the offset from the frame by 1/4" and add 3/8" support shims to the hard mount.  The reason was that frame flex was causing the side door to be out of plumb.  The mounting bracket above was being cut out of 3/8" 6 " angle iron.

The other half of the mounting "ear" was made out of 1/4" plate.

The hydraulic lift pump used to raise the top was removed from the tongue area and set aside during the welding to provide needed access.  In the end, the pump assembly will be relocated over the driver's side rear wheel very close to where it is currently sitting.

The hydraulic lift pump was moved from the tongue area to provide room for the 250# of lead acid batteries that will power the camper.  The battery tray will be in the open area between the frame rails in the photo above.

The front vertical pivot ear was welded onto an existing frame member.

The thicker angle bracket was also welded to the same member next to the support for the spare tire rack.

When the pivot bolt was installed in front pivot and the supports for the rear pivot were removed, there was about 7/16" of "float" on the rear frame member.  Our objective was 1/2", so this was very, very close.  We shimmed the rear to the desired 1/2" and then welded the vertical ear onto the rear cross member.  In  the photo above, you can see where the paint has been removed in anticipation of welding.

The front and rear pivots were welded to the frame cross members.  The center "hard mount" was not yet welded, but rather just clamped to the main I beams of the trailer.  We were confident in the mounting, so we decided to perform an articulation test to insure that our mounting strategy was correct and that there would be adequate clearance.  The plan was to use the fork lifts to elevate opposite corners of the truck and see what happens with respect to articulation of the frame rails of the truck relative to the camper frame.  Above, the forks of the fork lift were positioned around the tire prior to the lifting.

As the rear tire is lifted, you can see the truck frame rails twist.  The camper mounting frame is staying relatively level, at least so far.  This lift was only about 7".

As the lift height increased, you can see the camper start to tilt.  Note that the roof of the camper is elevated and would never be elevated for travel unless there were an emergency or a mechanical failure.

As the opposing front wheel was lifted, you start to see substantial articulation in the frame.  Above, note that the red frame (tire mount) is also a 3-point design but is hard mounted close to the rear end of the cab.  The brown, rust colored beam is part of the camper frame and is also a 3-point mount, but with a longer distance between the hard mount and the pivot point.

The front wheel is about 20" off the ground at this point.

The end of the frame rail is getting pretty close to the cross member.  I did a set of calculations to determine when the contact would occur and the theoretical vs. empirical difference was quite small. 

As the lift height increased the flexure angles increased as well.

The photo above is about 22" of lift on the front and about 10" on the back.  The rear fork lift had hydraulic seal issues which prevented the height from being constant due to seepage.

It looks scary, but it is only about 12 degrees of slope.

The camper frame was measured at 5 degrees of slope, nearly constant from front to back of the frame while the truck slope was about 12 degrees.

This was an interesting test, but somewhat scary.  The hydraulic lift system for the camper was disconnected and the top was staying in place based on the mechanical locking mechanism alone.  If the lock had failed, we would have been showered in fluid and the top would have come crashing down.  But, the locks held and there was no shower.

We demonstrated that the 3-point mounting system that we had designed will work as intended.   However, our observations did suggest that some additional clearances were indicated.  So, we will cut several of the beams just a tad to provide additional clearance.

It should be noted that the front stair step on the truck is about 20" from the ground.  In reality, unless you were going to hit the step, you would never go over an obstacle higher than 20".  The ground clearance under the differential pumpkin is less than that, so our test should be sufficient with respect to "real world" obstacles.  That said,  margin is a good thing.  There are many reasons that more than 20" of difference in wheel height might be encountered including pulling off a highway into a ditch, suffering a flat tire, etc.  So,  we will trim the beams before we place the camper on the truck frame "for good".

Navigation Links
Previous Adventure
Top of this Page
  Next Adventure
Trip Home Page  
Bill Caid's Home Page

Photos and Text Copyright Bill Caid 2010, all rights reserved.
For your enjoyment only, not for commercial use.